This post looks past the Tertiary Period into the previous slug of geologic time, the Mesozoic Era.
To geologists, our oldest rocks are not that old. To us a million years, as I said in Deep Oakland, is like the tick of a clock, and while Oakland rocks go back about 165 ticks there are rocks on Earth about twenty-five times older. Oakland is typical of the whole Bay area in its relative youth.
Oakland’s oldest rocks — the Leona volcanics and the Franciscan melange — have no fossils worth speaking of. Our oldest rocks that could preserve fossils belong to the Great Valley Sequence, a huge thick sheet of sandstone and mudstone that underlies the Central Valley and forms most of the ranges along its west side. Bits of it were torn off much later and moved around as the tectonics changed and the Coast Range rose, ending up in the Oakland Hills. They represent deep-sea environments, where underwater landslides carried sand and gravel far offshore and wiped out any bones or shells they might have had.
The oldest rocks in the Great Valley Sequence are mapped as the Knoxville Formation. They aren’t very tightly dated. The most meaningful fossil in the Knoxville for dating purposes is an elegant clamlike bivalve a couple inches long named Buchia piochii, first described in 1864.
Views of Buchia piochii from the Paskenta area, California, from Zacharov & Rogov (2020)
A recent study in the western Sacramento Valley found B. piochii in rocks ranging from the late Tithonian to the Berriasian Age, between about 150 and 142 million years ago — the latest Jurassic and earliest Cretaceous. Another later species in these rocks, Buchia crassicollis, is somewhat younger, around 130 Ma.
Buchia shells were collected from the Knoxville in the Sequoyah area in the early 1960s, but I haven’t seen one. The only fossil I’ve managed to find in the Knoxville Formation was in that same area, this belemnite mold in the streambed of upper Arroyo Viejo:
Belemnites were squidlike organisms whose fossils are so widespread they aren’t useful for dating purposes.
The next younger set of rocks in the sequence, the Joaquin Miller Formation, has yielded a few ammonite fossils that indicate a much later date, around 100 Ma. Y’all know ammonites, those flat-coiled shellfish that went extinct at the same time as the dinosaurs, 66 Ma.
A teeny ammonite I got at a rock shop. Ammonites could be bigger than a meter.
The next two overlying rock units, the Oakland Conglomerate and Shephard Creek Formation, are barren of fossils. Above them lies the Redwood Canyon Formation, which has yielded one piece of the uncoiled ammonite Baculites consistent with an age in the 70 Ma range. Needless to say, these rocks are poor hunting grounds.
The primary research on these fossils was done in the early 1960s. The people who did that research were lucky, in that the hills were a lot easier to study in those days. The spread of forests and houses since then has fenced off a lot of territory, and the passage of six decades has softened and crumbled the bedrock exposures where they made their collections.
Then there’s what I might call the passage of scientific time, which affects how we interpret published data. The odds that researchers will dig out the old specimens and re-evaluate them are slim. Still, I keep my antennae out for new findings.
What would be great is more fossils. The best place to look is in fresh excavations that expose good bedrock, and possibly in new landslide scars.